Difference between revisions of "Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff Tears and Associated Pathologies"

From WikiBeemed
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 73: Line 73:
 
The Patte test (Figure and Video) is the only test that allowed to analyze the muscular strength of the teres minor in case of deficient infraspinatus.<ref>Patte D, Goutallier D. [Grande libération antérieure dans l'épaule douloureuse par conflit antérieur]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1988;74:306-11.</ref>
 
The Patte test (Figure and Video) is the only test that allowed to analyze the muscular strength of the teres minor in case of deficient infraspinatus.<ref>Patte D, Goutallier D. [Grande libération antérieure dans l'épaule douloureuse par conflit antérieur]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1988;74:306-11.</ref>
 
[[File:1562465387058-lg.jpg|center|frame|Figure. 5<br>A) The Patte test is performed by passively taking from a starting point of 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, an elbow flexion of 90 degrees without external rotation.<br>B) The patient is asked to perform external rotation of the shoulder from this position against resistance. A positive Patte test is defined as external rotation power less than MRC Grade 4. Reproduce from Collin et al., with permission.]]
 
[[File:1562465387058-lg.jpg|center|frame|Figure. 5<br>A) The Patte test is performed by passively taking from a starting point of 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, an elbow flexion of 90 degrees without external rotation.<br>B) The patient is asked to perform external rotation of the shoulder from this position against resistance. A positive Patte test is defined as external rotation power less than MRC Grade 4. Reproduce from Collin et al., with permission.]]
<br />Walch et al. reported a 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity with the Patte test and teres minor fatty atrophy Grade 3 or greater.
+
<br />Walch et al. reported a 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity with the Patte test and teres minor fatty atrophy Grade 3 or greater.<ref>Walch G, Boulahia A, Calderone S, Robinson AH. The 'dropping' and 'hornblower's' signs in evaluation of rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:624-8.</ref>
 
 
10. Walch G, Boulahia A, Calderone S, Robinson AH. The 'dropping' and 'hornblower's' signs in evaluation of rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:624-8.
 
  
 
===== Dropping Sign =====
 
===== Dropping Sign =====

Revision as of 16:35, 2 January 2020

Bullet Points

  • The rotator cable explains why patients with most rotator cuff tears can maintain active forward flexion, and also why even after only a partial rotator cuff repair, good functional results can be achieved.
  • The most important negative prognostic factor is high-grade fatty infiltration of the rotator cuff muscle bellies (grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration).
  • The tangent sign is an indicator of advanced fatty infiltration and is a predictor of whether a rotator cuff tear will be reparable.
  • Full thickness disruption of the lateral tendon stump (B1) is the most frequent type of rotator cuff lesion, comprising approximately 90% of all surgically treated lesions.
  • Musculotendinous junction lesions (C-type) or rare and characterized by an edema of the muscle belly. They are associated to calcific deposit (infraspinatus) or trauma (supraspinatus). Unrepaired, grade III lesions lead rapidly to grade 4 fatty infiltration of the muscle.
  • Tendon retraction is classified according to Patte. Overreduction and lateral transposition of the tendon over the greater tuberosity may be unphysiological.
  • Massive rotator cuff has different definitions in the literature, each having potential benefits or drawbacks.
  • Massive rotator cuff tears comprise approximately 20% of all cuff tears and 80% of recurrent tears.
  • The classification of Collin not only subclassifies massive tears but has also been linked to function, particularly the maintenance of active elevation.
  • Non-surgical treatment is effective in patient with massive rotator cuff if the tear involves less than three tendons and do not involves the subscapularis (D-type).
  • Biomechanical testing has consistently demonstrated the superiority of double-row constructs over single-row. However, there is no obvious difference clinically.
  • There is actually no support for routine suprascapular nerve release when massive rotator cuff repair is performed.
  • Functional outcome improved after revision rotator cuff repair and 70% or more of patients were satisfied or very satisfied. However, the prevalence of persistent defect (retear or non-healing) is 28% at six months and 40% at two years.
  • Rotator cuff are irreparable when associated to true pseudoparalysis with the presence of lag signs (external rotation lag, drop, dropping, hornblower signs), femoralization of the humerus or acetabulization of the acromion, grade 3 or 4 fatty infiltration and tangent sign.
  • The current literature does not support the initial use of complex and expensive techniques in the management of posterosuperior irreparable rotator cuff tears.

Key Words

Shoulder arthroscopy; Rotator cuff lesion; Partial repair; Tear pattern; Classification; Massive; Reparable and non-repairable; Irreparable; Imaging; Recurrent; Failed; Revision surgery; Open and arthroscopic approach; Conservative or non-operative treatment; Physiotherapy; Functional outcomes; Prognostic factors; Latissimus dorsi transfer; Subacromial spacer interposition; Balloon; Biceps tenotomy; Superior capsular reconstruction; Reverse arthroplasty; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) arthrography (MRA); Fosbury flop tear; New tear pattern; FUSSI; SAM.

Biomechanics of the Posterosuperior Rotator Cuff

A primary function of the rotator cuff is to work synergistically with the deltoid to maintain a balanced force couple about the glenohumeral joint. A force couple is a pair of forces that act on an object and tend to cause it to rotate. For any object to be in equilibrium, the forces must create moments about a center of rotation that are equal in magnitude and opposite in direction. Coronal and transverse plane force couples exist between the subscapularis anteriorly and infraspinatus and teres minor posteriorly. The rotator cuff force across the glenoid provides concavity compression, which creates a stable fulcrum and allows the periscapular muscles to move the humerus around the glenoid.

The rotator cable is a thickening of the rotator cuff that has been likened to a suspension bridge in which force is distributed through cables that are supported by pillars (the anterior and posterior attachments). The anterior rotator cable attachment bifurcates to attach to bone just anterior and posterior to the proximal aspect of the bicipital groove. The posterior attachment comprises the inferior 50% of the infraspinatus. With small central tears the cable attachments often stay intact and forces are transmitted along the rotator cable. The rotator cable also explains why patients with most rotator cuff tears can maintain active forward flexion, and also why even after only a partial rotator cuff repair, good functional results can be achieved.[1]

However, in the setting of massive rotator cuff with rotator cable disruption and non-compensation by other humeral head stabilizers (i.e pectoralis major and latissimus dorsi), the moments created by the opposing muscular forces are insufficient to maintain equilibrium in the coronal plane, resulting in altered kinematics, instability, and ultimately in pseudoparalysis. Interestingly, only few patients with an irreparable rotator cuff tears developed pseudoparalysis and arthritis.This finding has at least two potential explanations. First, the subscapularis that may not be involved in these tears is the key factor of active forward flexion.[2]

Second, the rotator cable, has still an intact anterior attachment which is important for elevation. This may explain why patients can maintain active mobility, and also why even after only a partial rotator cuff repair, good functional results can be achieved.[3]

Consequently, all the conditions for an imbalance in the force couples are not always met and subsequently loss of function is only occasionally seen.

Clinical examination

Supraspinatus

Superior rotator cuff insufficiency, present in complete tears, is usually associated with a positive Jobe manoeuver and decreased strength in the external resistance of the elbow at the side.[4]

Sensitive-content.png
Sensitive-content.png

Figure. 1 Jobe manoeuver: the examiner push both arms down at the level of the wrists. Reproduce from Liotard J, Walch G. Test de Jobe. Recherche d'une atteinte du tendon supraépineux. In: Rodineau J, ed. 33 tests incontournables en traumatologie du sport. Paris: Éd. scientifiques; 2009, with permission.

Testing of abduction strength in the champagne toast position, i.e., 30° of abduction, mild external rotation, and 30° of flexion, better isolates the activity of the supraspinatus from the deltoid than Jobe's “empty can” position (Figure).[5]

Figure. 2 Testing at 30° of abduction, 30° of forward elevation, 90° of elbow flexion, and mild external rotation replicates a “toast” position.


Infraspinatus and Teres Minor

Strength in External Rotation Elbow at the Side

Strength in external rotation elbow at the side of the supraspinatus, infraspinatus and teres minor represents approximately 10%, 70% and 20% of total external rotation strength, respectively.[6]

However, the function of the teres minor may become more important in the setting of a chronic infraspinatus tear, as its hypertrophy is commonly observed in these cases and probably compensates for external rotation weakness.

External Rotation Lag Sign

The external rotation lag sign (Figure and Video), described by Hertel, was designed to test the integrity of infraspinatus and supraspinatus tendons.[7]

The extent of internal rotation is recorded to the nearest 10 degrees degrees (10, 20, 30 and 40 degrees or above). An external rotation lag sign > 40 degrees seems to be the most reliable test for the teres minor.[8]

Figure. 3 A) The external rotation lag sign is performed seated with the elbow flexed to 90 degrees and the shoulder elevated 20 degrees in the scapular plane. The arm is passively taken to maximal external rotation minus 5 degrees to allow for elastic recoil. B) The patient was asked to maintain that position as the clinician released the wrist. A positive test is defined as any internal rotation of more than 10 degrees. Reproduce from Collin et al., with permission.
Drop Sign

The drop sign (Figure and Video), also described by Hertel, is designed to assess the function of the infraspinatus.

Figure. 4
A) The drop sign is a lag sign beginning from 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, with elbow flexion of 90 degrees, and external rotation of the shoulder to 90 degrees. From this position, the patient is asked to maintain the position against gravity (MRC Grade 3).
B) Failure to resist gravity and internal rotation of the arm is considered a positive drop sign. Reproduce from Collin et al., with permission.
Sensitive-content.png
Hornblower sign

The patient is asked to bring both hands to his mouth, but is unable to do so without abducting the affected arm (Video).

Sensitive-content.png


Patte Test

The Patte test (Figure and Video) is the only test that allowed to analyze the muscular strength of the teres minor in case of deficient infraspinatus.[9]

Figure. 5
A) The Patte test is performed by passively taking from a starting point of 90 degrees of abduction in the scapular plane, an elbow flexion of 90 degrees without external rotation.
B) The patient is asked to perform external rotation of the shoulder from this position against resistance. A positive Patte test is defined as external rotation power less than MRC Grade 4. Reproduce from Collin et al., with permission.


Walch et al. reported a 100% sensitivity and 93% specificity with the Patte test and teres minor fatty atrophy Grade 3 or greater.[10]

Dropping Sign

The dropping sign of Neer had a 100% sensitivity and 66% specificity for teres minor involvement.

11. Neer C. Cuff tears, biceps lesions, and impingement. In: Neer C, ed. Shoulder reconstruction. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders Company; 1990:41-142.

12. Walch G, Boulahia A, Calderone S, Robinson AH. The 'dropping' and 'hornblower's' signs in evaluation of rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:624-8.

References

  1. Burkhart SS, Nottage WM, Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Kohn HS, Pachelli A. Partial repair of irreparable rotator cuff tears. Arthroscopy 1994;10:363-70.
  2. Collin P, Matsumura N, Lädermann A, Denard PJ, Walch G. Relationship between massive chronic rotator cuff tear pattern and loss of active shoulder range of motion. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2014;23:1195-202.
  3. Denard PJ, Lädermann A, Brady PC, et al. Pseudoparalysis From a Massive Rotator Cuff Tear Is Reliably Reversed With an Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair in Patients Without Preoperative Glenohumeral Arthritis. Am J Sports Med 2015;43:2373-8.
  4. Jobe FW, Moynes DR. Delineation of diagnostic criteria and a rehabilitation program for rotator cuff injuries. Am J Sports Med 1982;10:336-9.
  5. Chalmers PN, Cvetanovich GL, Kupfer N, et al. The champagne toast position isolates the supraspinatus better than the Jobe test: an electromyographic study of shoulder physical examination tests. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2016;25:322-9.
  6. Gerber C, Blumenthal S, Curt A, Werner CM. Effect of selective experimental suprascapular nerve block on abduction and external rotation strength of the shoulder. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;16:815-20.
  7. Hertel R, Ballmer FT, Lombert SM, Gerber C. Lag signs in the diagnosis of rotator cuff rupture. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1996;5:307-13.
  8. Collin P, Treseder T, Denard PJ, Neyton L, Walch G, Lädermann A. What is the Best Clinical Test for Assessment of the Teres Minor in Massive Rotator Cuff Tears? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2015;473:2959-66.
  9. Patte D, Goutallier D. [Grande libération antérieure dans l'épaule douloureuse par conflit antérieur]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1988;74:306-11.
  10. Walch G, Boulahia A, Calderone S, Robinson AH. The 'dropping' and 'hornblower's' signs in evaluation of rotator-cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998;80:624-8.